Dillingham v. Garcia et al

Filing 59

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 58 Motion for Expedited Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/22/19. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

JERRY DILLINGHAM,

10
11
12

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:18-cv-00579-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND

F. GARCIA,

13

Defendant.

(ECF NO. 58)

14
15
16
17

Jerry Dillingham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On July 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for administrative relief. (ECF No. 58). In

18

light of the upcoming settlement conference, Plaintiff asks for an expedited ruling on his

19

motion for leave to amend, and for an expedited screening of his amended complaint.1

20
21

Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. The Court will rule on Plaintiff’s motion to amend, and
if necessary, screen his complaint, in due course.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 22, 2019

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1

The Court notes that the parties are not required to present evidence at the settlement conference.
1