Board of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al. v. Absolute Urethane

Filing 12

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiffs to either File a Motion for Default Judgment or Show Cause why this Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute; Fourteen (14) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/28/2018. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 12 BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE ROOFERS LOCAL 27 HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 11 14 15 16 Case No. 1:18-cv-00623-DAD-SAB ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO EITHER FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT OR SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE v. ABSOLUTE URETHANE, FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 17 18 Boards of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers 19 Local 27, Fresno Roofing Contractors Vacation Fund, and Roofers Local 27 Apprenticeship 20 Training Fund (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this action on May 7, 2018 against Defendant 21 Absolute Urethane. On June 7, 2018, the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendant 22 Absolute Urethane. As of this date, no motion for default judgment has been filed. 23 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- 24 step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 25 (N.D.Cal. Feb, 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a 26 judgment for affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided 27 by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or 28 otherwise. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, the plaintiff can seek entry of default 1 1 judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1) and (2). “Default judgments are generally disfavored, and 2 whenever it is reasonably possible, cases should be decided upon their merits.” In re Hammer, 3 940 F.2d 524, (9th Cir. 1991) (internal punctuation and citations omitted). There has been no activity in in this action since the entry of default. The Court shall 4 5 require Plaintiffs to either file a motion for default judgment or show cause why this action 6 should not be dismissed for Plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall either file a motion for default judgment or file a written response showing cause 9 why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute; and 10 2. 11 Failure to comply with this order shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: August 28, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?