Board of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al. v. Absolute Urethane
Filing
12
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiffs to either File a Motion for Default Judgment or Show Cause why this Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute; Fourteen (14) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/28/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
12
BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE
ROOFERS LOCAL 27 HEALTH AND
WELFARE TRUST FUND, et al.,
13
Plaintiffs,
11
14
15
16
Case No. 1:18-cv-00623-DAD-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO
EITHER FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT OR SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
v.
ABSOLUTE URETHANE,
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
Defendant.
17
18
Boards of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers
19 Local 27, Fresno Roofing Contractors Vacation Fund, and Roofers Local 27 Apprenticeship
20 Training Fund (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this action on May 7, 2018 against Defendant
21 Absolute Urethane. On June 7, 2018, the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendant
22 Absolute Urethane. As of this date, no motion for default judgment has been filed.
23
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two-
24 step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2
25 (N.D.Cal. Feb, 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a
26 judgment for affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided
27 by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or
28 otherwise. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, the plaintiff can seek entry of default
1
1 judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1) and (2). “Default judgments are generally disfavored, and
2 whenever it is reasonably possible, cases should be decided upon their merits.” In re Hammer,
3 940 F.2d 524, (9th Cir. 1991) (internal punctuation and citations omitted).
There has been no activity in in this action since the entry of default. The Court shall
4
5 require Plaintiffs to either file a motion for default judgment or show cause why this action
6 should not be dismissed for Plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute.
7
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
8
1.
Within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall
either file a motion for default judgment or file a written response showing cause
9
why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute; and
10
2.
11
Failure to comply with this order shall result in a recommendation that this action
be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15 Dated:
August 28, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?