Cisneros v. Moreno et al

Filing 25

ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 23 Motion for a Stay and Defendants' Request to Opt Out of Alternate Dispute Resolution 20 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/18/19. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT CISNEROS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 MORENO, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00628-LJO-JDP ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR A STAY AND DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO OPT OUT OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Defendants. ECF Nos. 20 and 23 16 17 18 Plaintiff Robert Cisneros is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 19 action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 16, 2019, defendants filed a motion for 20 summary judgment, arguing that Cisneros failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before 21 filing this suit. ECF No. 19. On August 20, defendants filed a motion to stay discovery pending 22 resolution of the motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 20. And, on September 11, defendants 23 asked to be exempted from the court’s alternative dispute resolution program, citing the pending 24 motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 23. 25 Good cause having been shown, defendants’ motion and request are granted. The current 26 discovery and scheduling order is vacated, as is the order setting this case for alternative dispute 27 resolution and scheduling a settlement conference. See ECF Nos. 18 and 21. I will issue a new 28 scheduling order, if necessary, once the motion for summary judgment is decided. 1 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: September 18, 2019 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 No. 205. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?