Cisneros v. Moreno et al
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 23 Motion for a Stay and Defendants' Request to Opt Out of Alternate Dispute Resolution 20 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/18/19. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT CISNEROS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
MORENO, et al.,
Case No. 1:18-cv-00628-LJO-JDP
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR A STAY AND
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO OPT OUT
OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION
Defendants.
ECF Nos. 20 and 23
16
17
18
Plaintiff Robert Cisneros is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights
19
action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 16, 2019, defendants filed a motion for
20
summary judgment, arguing that Cisneros failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before
21
filing this suit. ECF No. 19. On August 20, defendants filed a motion to stay discovery pending
22
resolution of the motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 20. And, on September 11, defendants
23
asked to be exempted from the court’s alternative dispute resolution program, citing the pending
24
motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 23.
25
Good cause having been shown, defendants’ motion and request are granted. The current
26
discovery and scheduling order is vacated, as is the order setting this case for alternative dispute
27
resolution and scheduling a settlement conference. See ECF Nos. 18 and 21. I will issue a new
28
scheduling order, if necessary, once the motion for summary judgment is decided.
1
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated:
September 18, 2019
4
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
No. 205.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?