Soria v. Zuniga et al
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Proceed only on Cognizable Claims and to Dismiss all other Claims and Defendants without Leave to Amend signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/1/2019. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 10/18/2019. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STEVEN SORIA,
12
13
14
15
16
CASE NO. 1:18-cv-0635-LJO-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff,
v.
RAFEL ZUNGIA, et al.,
Defendants.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO PROCEED ONLY ON COGNIZABLE
CLAIMS AND TO DISMISS ALL OTHER
CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS WITHOUT
LEAVE TO AMEND
(Doc. 7)
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
17
The Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found it stated a claim under
18
the Eighth Amendment for denial of medical care against defendants Lt. Herron, Camp
19
Administrator Allison, Dr. Morales, and Case Manager Coordinator R. Gonzales. Insofar as
20
plaintiff sought to assert other claims against these and/or other defendants, the Court determined
21
they were not cognizable. The Court directed the plaintiff to file a notice indicating whether he
22
wished to stand on his pleading, to dismiss this case, or to file another amended pleading. He has
23
now submitted his notice of intent to proceed the claims the Court has found to be cognizable.
24
Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that this action proceed solely on the claims
25
identified above and all other claims and defendants should be dismissed without leave to amend.
26
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
27
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days
28
1
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
2
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
3
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may
4
result in waiver of the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
5
(9th Cir. 1991).
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 1, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?