Cannon v. Daves et al

Filing 13

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Withdraw First Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 04/29/2019. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KELVIN CANNON, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 KONG, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00666-LJO-JDP ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 12 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Kelvin Cannon is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 18 action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 15, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s first 19 amended complaint and found that he failed to state a claim against any defendant. ECF No. 11. 20 The court gave plaintiff two options: First, plaintiff could withdraw his first amended complaint 21 and proceed on his original complaint, which the court found stated cognizable claims. Id. 22 Second, plaintiff could file a second amended complaint with the requisite detail for this action to 23 proceed. Id. 24 On April 22, 2019, plaintiff moved to withdraw his first amended complaint. ECF No. 12. 25 The court hereby grants his motion. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, ECF No. 10, is 26 considered withdrawn, and the action will proceed on plaintiff’s original complaint, filed May 16, 27 2019, ECF No. 1. The findings and recommendations, issued on March 29, 2019, that plaintiff be 28 permitted to proceed on cognizable claims stated in his original complaint and that non1 1 cognizable claims be dismissed with leave to amend will now be considered by the district judge 2 assigned to this case. ECF No. 9. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 April 29, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 No. 203 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?