Mason v. Corizon Health Care

Filing 7

ORDER denying 6 Motion for Default Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/20/2018. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD WAYNE MASON, 12 13 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:18-cv-00676-BAM (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. (ECF No. 6) 14 CORIZON HEALTH CARE, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Edward Wayne Mason (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this 19 action on May 17, 2018. 20 21 On September 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for default judgment against Defendant Corizon Health Care. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff’s request is premature. 22 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 23 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 24 § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous 25 or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary 26 relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2); 28 U.S.C. 27 § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve Plaintiff’s complaint 28 only after the Court has screened the complaint and determined that it contains a cognizable claim 1 1 2 for relief against the named defendants. Plaintiff’s complaint is currently in the screening stage and has not been served on any 3 defendant. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, (ECF No. 6), is HEREBY 4 DENIED. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara September 20, 2018 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?