Dial v. Matevousion, et al.

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING 25 Findings and Recommendations and ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Without Prejudice signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/13/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SHAUNDELLE DIAL,

12
13
14
15

No. 1:18-cv-00679-DAD-JDP (PC)

Plaintiff,
v.
ANDRE MATEVOUSION, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
CASE
(Doc. No. 25)

16
17
18

Plaintiff Shaundelle Dial is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

19

this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

20

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On July 3, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations,

22

recommending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failures to prosecute and

23

comply with court orders. (Doc. No. 25.) The findings and recommendations were served on

24

plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14)

25

days after service. (Id. at 3.) On July 16, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge granted plaintiff’s

26

first motion for extension of time and provided him an additional fourteen days to file objections.

27

(Doc. No. 27.) On August 21, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge granted plaintiff’s second

28

motion for extension of time and approved an additional fourteen days to file objections. (Doc.
1

1
2

No. 29.) No objections have been filed and the time in which to do so has now passed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

3

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

4

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

5

analysis.

6

Accordingly:

7

1. The findings and recommendations issued on July 3, 2019 (Doc. No. 25) are

8

adopted in full;

9

2. Plaintiff’s action is dismissed without prejudice; and

10

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 13, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2