Knox v. Biter
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and ORDER DISMISSING ACTION for Failure to State a Cognizable Claim for Relief signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/12/2018. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
WILLIE H. KNOX, III.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
M. BITER,
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00761-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, AND DISMISSING
ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF
[ECF Nos. 15, 16, 17]
17
Plaintiff Willie H. Knox III is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On August 22, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation recommending
21
that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. The Findings and
22
Recommendation was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within
23
twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff filed objections on September 17, 2018. (ECF No. 17.)
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
25
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, the
26
Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
The Findings and Recommendation, filed on August 22, 2018, is adopted in full; and
2.
The instant action is dismissed for a failure to state a cognizable claim for relief; and
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 12, 2018
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?