Ogunbanke v. Nielsen et al
Filing
42
ORDER DIRECTING Respondents to Serve Motion to Dismiss on Petitioner; ORDER Setting Deadline to Respond to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/17/19. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TAYO OLUGBOYEGA OGUNBANKE,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:18-cv-00796-LJO-JDP
Petitioner,
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO
SERVE MOTION TO DISMISS ON
PETITIONER
KIRSTEN NIELSEN, et al.,
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO RESPONDENT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS
v.
Respondents.
16
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
17
ECF No. 40
18
19
Petitioner Tayo Olugboyega Ogunbanke, a former detainee in the custody of the U.S.
20
Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), is proceeding without counsel with a
21
petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. On September 16, 2019,
22
petitioner was removed from the United States to Lagos, Nigeria. See ECF Nos. 41, 40-1. In
23
response to petitioner’s removal, respondents filed a motion to dismiss the habeas petition for
24
mootness on October 15, 2019. See ECF No. 40. Respondents did not serve the petitioner with
25
the motion to dismiss due to a lack of forwarding address. See id. at 8. On October 15, 2019,
26
petitioner provided the court with his new address. ECF No. 41.
27
Accordingly, I hereby order that:
28
1
1
2
1. Respondents must serve a copy of the motion to dismiss on petitioner at his updated
3
4
address; and
2. Within twenty-one days of the date of service of respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No.
5
40, petitioner may file a response to the motion.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
October 17, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
No. 206
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?