Ogunbanke v. Nielsen et al

Filing 42

ORDER DIRECTING Respondents to Serve Motion to Dismiss on Petitioner; ORDER Setting Deadline to Respond to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/17/19. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAYO OLUGBOYEGA OGUNBANKE, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:18-cv-00796-LJO-JDP Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SERVE MOTION TO DISMISS ON PETITIONER KIRSTEN NIELSEN, et al., ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. Respondents. 16 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 17 ECF No. 40 18 19 Petitioner Tayo Olugboyega Ogunbanke, a former detainee in the custody of the U.S. 20 Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), is proceeding without counsel with a 21 petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. On September 16, 2019, 22 petitioner was removed from the United States to Lagos, Nigeria. See ECF Nos. 41, 40-1. In 23 response to petitioner’s removal, respondents filed a motion to dismiss the habeas petition for 24 mootness on October 15, 2019. See ECF No. 40. Respondents did not serve the petitioner with 25 the motion to dismiss due to a lack of forwarding address. See id. at 8. On October 15, 2019, 26 petitioner provided the court with his new address. ECF No. 41. 27 Accordingly, I hereby order that: 28 1 1 2 1. Respondents must serve a copy of the motion to dismiss on petitioner at his updated 3 4 address; and 2. Within twenty-one days of the date of service of respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 5 40, petitioner may file a response to the motion. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: October 17, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 No. 206 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?