Knapp v. Madera County Department of Corrections, et al.

Filing 42

ORDER Adopting 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION in Full and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief for Lack of Jurisdiction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/12/2019. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARTHUR DEAN KNAPP,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
MADERA COUNTY DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.

16

Case No. 1:18-cv-00811-LJO-SKO (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION IN FULL AND
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION
(Docs. 26, 39)

17
Plaintiff, Arthur Dean Knapp, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

18
19

in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

20

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 7, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations to deny

21
22

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. 39.) This was served on the

23

parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither side

24

filed any objections. Local Rule 304(b), (d).
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a

25
26

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the

27

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28

///

1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

3
4

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on June 7, 2019 (Doc. 39), is adopted
in full; and

2.

5

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, filed on April 1, 2019, (Doc. 26), is
DENIED for lack of jurisdiction.

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

July 12, 2019

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2