Davis v. State of California et al

Filing 33

ORDER DENYING 31 Motion for Stamps and Envelopes signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/26/2019. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEROME MARKIEL DAVIS, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:18-cv-00832-DAD-BAM (PC) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STAMPS AND ENVELOPES v. (ECF No. 31) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Jerome Markiel Davis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 19 Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Roberts in her individual capacity for deliberate 20 indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising from the alleged incident of food 21 tampering. 22 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for stamps and envelopes, filed August 23, 23 2019. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff states that he is an in forma pauperis inmate, and he does not have 24 any more stamps or envelopes to keep up with this action. Plaintiff requests that the court send 25 him stationary, specifically books of stamps and envelopes. (Id.) 26 In the Court’s First Informational Order, issued June 20, 2018, Plaintiff was advised that 27 “[t]he Court will not make copies of filed documents or provide postage or envelopes for free 28 even for parties proceeding in forma pauperis.” (ECF No. 3, p. 3.) Although Plaintiff is 1 1 proceeding in forma pauperis, that status does not entitle him to free stamps or envelopes from 2 the Court. 3 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for stamps and envelopes, (ECF No. 31), is DENIED. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara August 26, 2019 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?