Winston, Jr v. Cardenas
Filing
20
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Without Prejudice 19 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/29/2018. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MYOHO MYSTIC WINSTON, JR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
Case No. 1:18-cv-00857-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
(ECF NO. 19)
J. CARDENAS,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
Myoho Winston, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
20
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is now proceeding “on
21
Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Cardenas.” (ECF No. 6, p.
22
5).
23
On October 26, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19), which
24
the Court will deny without prejudice. Plaintiff’s motion does not comply with this Court’s local
25
rules. While Plaintiff did submit a declaration and attach evidence, Local Rule 260(a) requires
26
that “[e]ach motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication shall be accompanied by a
27
‘Statement of Undisputed Facts’ that shall enumerate discretely each of the specific material facts
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
relied upon in support of the motion and cite the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit,
deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document relied upon to establish that fact.”
Here, Plaintiff failed to file a “Statement of Undisputed Facts.”
Moreover, based on the facts of this case, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion is
premature because discovery has not yet been opened.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED,
without prejudice to Plaintiff re-filing the motion after discovery has opened and in compliance
with this Court’s local rules.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:
October 29, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?