Kerkorian v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Filing 12

JOINT STIPULATION ADN ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. (Doc. 11) Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. is HEREBY GRANTED an extension of time of an additional twenty-eight (28) days, up to and including August 28, 2018, to respond to the First Amended Complaint in this action. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/2/2018. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 Michael D. Adams (State Bar No. 185835) madams@rutan.com 2 Brian C. Berggren (State Bar No. 279279) bberggren@rutan.com 3 Danielle Serbin (State Bar No. 294369) dserbin@rutan.com 4 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 5 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931 Telephone: 714-641-5100 6 Facsimile: 714-546-9035 7 Attorneys for Defendant SAMSUNG ELECTRONICA AMERICA, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 PAUL KERKORIAN, an individual, on behalf of himself and all other similarly 13 situated, Plaintiff, 14 15 v. Case No. 1:18-cv-00870-DAD-SKO JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 11) 16 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New Jersey 17 corporation, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 This Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended 22 Complaint is entered into by and between, on the one hand, Plaintiff Paul Kerkorian 23 (“Plaintiff”), and, on the other hand, Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 24 (“Defendant”). 25 RECITALS 26 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 22, 2018 (Dkt. No. 2); 27 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on July 3, 28 -12861/099999-0084 12664071.1 a08/02/18 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2018 (Dkt. No. 8); 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiff personally served the FAC on Samsung on July 10, 3 2018 (See Dkt. No. 9); 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 15(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil 5 Procedure, Defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC is presently 6 July 31, 2018; 7 WHEREAS, Defendant has requested and Plaintiff has consented to an 8 additional 28 days for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC; 9 WHEREAS, an additional 28 days for Defendant to answer or otherwise 10 respond to the FAC will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed 11 by Court order; 12 WHEREAS, Defendant has not previously requested any extension of time in 13 this case; STIPULATION 14 15 BASED UPON THE FOREGOING, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE 16 AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 17 The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the First 18 Amended Complaint in this matter shall be extended by twenty-eight (28) days, 19 from July 31, 2018 to August 28, 2018. 20 Dated: August 2, 2018 21 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP MICHAEL D. ADAMS BRIAN C. BERGGREN DANIELLE SERBIN 22 By: /s/ Michael Adams Michael D. Adams Attorneys for Defendant SAMSUNG ELECTRONICA AMERICA, INC. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -22861/099999-0084 12664071.1 a08/02/18 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Dated: August 2, 2018 2 WEBB LAW GROUP, APC LENDEN F. WEBB CHRISTOPHER E. NICHOLS 3 By: /s/ Christopher E. Nichols Christopher E. Nichols Attorneys for Plaintiff PAUL KERKORIAN 4 5 6 7 8 9 ORDER 10 Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond 11 12 to First Amended Complaint (Doc. 11), and pursuant Local Rule 144(a), Defendant 13 Samsung Electronics America, Inc. is HEREBY GRANTED an extension of time of 14 an additional twenty-eight (28) days, up to and including August 28, 2018, to respond 15 to the First Amended Complaint in this action. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: August 2, 2018 19 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -32861/099999-0084 12664071.1 a08/02/18 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?