Kerkorian v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Filing
12
JOINT STIPULATION ADN ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. (Doc. 11) Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. is HEREBY GRANTED an extension of time of an additional twenty-eight (28) days, up to and including August 28, 2018, to respond to the First Amended Complaint in this action. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/2/2018. (Timken, A)
1 Michael D. Adams (State Bar No. 185835)
madams@rutan.com
2 Brian C. Berggren (State Bar No. 279279)
bberggren@rutan.com
3 Danielle Serbin (State Bar No. 294369)
dserbin@rutan.com
4 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400
5 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931
Telephone: 714-641-5100
6 Facsimile: 714-546-9035
7 Attorneys for Defendant
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICA AMERICA, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
FRESNO DIVISION
12 PAUL KERKORIAN, an individual, on
behalf of himself and all other similarly
13 situated,
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
Case No. 1:18-cv-00870-DAD-SKO
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 11)
16 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New Jersey
17 corporation, and DOES 1 through 25,
inclusive,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
This Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended
22 Complaint is entered into by and between, on the one hand, Plaintiff Paul Kerkorian
23 (“Plaintiff”), and, on the other hand, Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
24 (“Defendant”).
25
RECITALS
26
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 22, 2018 (Dkt. No. 2);
27
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on July 3,
28
-12861/099999-0084
12664071.1 a08/02/18
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1 2018 (Dkt. No. 8);
2
WHEREAS, Plaintiff personally served the FAC on Samsung on July 10,
3 2018 (See Dkt. No. 9);
4
WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 15(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil
5 Procedure, Defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC is presently
6 July 31, 2018;
7
WHEREAS, Defendant has requested and Plaintiff has consented to an
8 additional 28 days for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC;
9
WHEREAS, an additional 28 days for Defendant to answer or otherwise
10 respond to the FAC will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed
11 by Court order;
12
WHEREAS, Defendant has not previously requested any extension of time in
13 this case;
STIPULATION
14
15
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE
16 AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
17
The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the First
18 Amended Complaint in this matter shall be extended by twenty-eight (28) days,
19 from July 31, 2018 to August 28, 2018.
20 Dated: August 2, 2018
21
RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
MICHAEL D. ADAMS
BRIAN C. BERGGREN
DANIELLE SERBIN
22
By: /s/ Michael Adams
Michael D. Adams
Attorneys for Defendant
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICA
AMERICA, INC.
23
24
25
26
27
28
-22861/099999-0084
12664071.1 a08/02/18
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1 Dated: August 2, 2018
2
WEBB LAW GROUP, APC
LENDEN F. WEBB
CHRISTOPHER E. NICHOLS
3
By: /s/ Christopher E. Nichols
Christopher E. Nichols
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PAUL KERKORIAN
4
5
6
7
8
9
ORDER
10
Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond
11
12 to First Amended Complaint (Doc. 11), and pursuant Local Rule 144(a), Defendant
13 Samsung Electronics America, Inc. is HEREBY GRANTED an extension of time of
14 an additional twenty-eight (28) days, up to and including August 28, 2018, to respond
15 to the First Amended Complaint in this action.
16
17 IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated:
August 2, 2018
19
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-32861/099999-0084
12664071.1 a08/02/18
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?