Guevara v. Superior Court County of San Mateo et al
Filing
17
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Proceed IFP as MOOT; ORDER VACATING 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/18/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE TIMOTEO GUEVARA,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF SAN
MATEO, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
Case No. 1:18-cv-00871-DAD-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS
MOOT
(ECF No. 13)
ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS
(ECF No. 15)
Plaintiff Jose Timoteo Guevara (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
On August 31, 2018, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations
21
recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that
22
Plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (ECF No.
23
15.) Those findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any
24
objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 2.)
25
26
27
28
On September 17, 2018, rather than filing objections to the findings and
recommendations, Plaintiff paid the $400.00 filing fee in full.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 13), is HEREBY
DENIED as moot, and the findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in
1
1
forma pauperis, (ECF No. 15), are VACATED. Plaintiff’s complaint will be screened in due
2
course.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
September 18, 2018
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?