(SS) Andrade v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
28
STIPULATION and ORDER for the award of Attorney Fees under The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 USC 2412(d) signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/9/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
17 Jesus Chavez Andrade,
18
Plaintiff,
19
v.
20
21 Andrew Saul, Commissioner of
22 Social Security,
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 1:18-cv-00913-JDP
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER
THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
(EAJA)
28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
Defendant.
TO THE HONORABLE JEREMY D. PETERSON, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:
The Parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Court’s approval,
stipulate that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND
1 FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY-FOUR DOLLARS AND 73/100, ($7,454.73), under
2 the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents
3 compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in
4 connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to
Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability
to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset
allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After
the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are
subject to any offset.
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause
15 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to counsel, pursuant to the
16 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s
17 counsel, Jonathan O. Peña.
18
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for
19 EAJA fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant
20 under the EAJA. Payment SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY21 FOUR DOLLARS AND 73/100, ($7,454.73), in EAJA attorney fees shall constitute a
22 complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s
23 attorney, Jonathan O. Peña, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with
24 this action.
25
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s attorney to seek Social
26
27
Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause
provisions of the EAJA.
28
-2-
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
3 Dated: September 23, 2019
4
5
6 Dated: September 27, 2019
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
/s/ Jonathan O. Peña
JONATHAN O. PEÑA
Attorney for Plaintiff
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
By: _*_Marcelo N. Illarmo
Marcelo N. Illarmo
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
(*Permission to use electronic signature
obtained via email on September 27, 2019)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3 Dated:
4
October 9, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7 No. 204
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?