Oseguera v. Walmart, Inc.
Filing
17
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/23/2019. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANGELA OSEGUERA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No.: 1:18-cv-01029-AWI BAM
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
v.
14
WALMART, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
The Court has set this matter for a settlement conference on May 20, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. Thus,
17
18
the Court ORDERS:
1. A representative with the authority to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement shall
19
attend in person1;
20
2. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. The
21
22
failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in person
23
may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not proceed and
24
25
26
27
28
1
The individuals attending the settlement conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree to
settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir.
1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1396 (9th Cir. 1993). The individuals must
have the ability to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481,
485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL 23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The
purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with appropriate settlement authority is that the parties’ view of the
case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486.
1
will be reset to another date;
1
2
3.
No later than May 1, 2019, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via fax or e-mail, a
3
written itemization of damages and a meaningful2 settlement demand which includes a
4
brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than May
5
10, Defendant SHALL respond via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or with a
6
meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is
7
appropriate. The parties SHALL continue to exchange offers, until it appears they have
8
reached impasse. If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their
9
settlement offers to their Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described
10
below. Copies of these documents shall not be filed on the court docket.
11
4. Parties shall lodge confidential settlement statements to by email to
12
JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov no later than May 15, 2019. Parties shall also file a Notice of
13
Submission of Confidential Settlement Statement (See Local Rule 270(d)). Settlement
14
statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party.
15
Settlement statements shall be clearly marked Aconfidential@ with the date and time of the
16
settlement conference indicated prominently thereon.
17
6. The confidential settlement statement shall be typed or neatly printed, and include the
18
following:
19
a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.
20
b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon
21
which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties= likelihood of
22
prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in
23
dispute.
24
c. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and
25
26
27
28
2
“Meaningful” means the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering party.
“Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If, however,
the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should trigger a
recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the settlement
conference via stipulation.
2
trial.
1
d. The party=s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a
2
history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
3
e. A brief statement of each party=s expectations and goals for the settlement
4
conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 23, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?