Roux v. North Bakersfield Nissan, Inc.
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER 13 to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/5/2018. Responsive pleading due by 12/26/2018. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
NICHOLAS STREET, ESQ. – SBN 249156
CLIFFORD & BROWN
A Professional Corporation
Attorneys at Law
Bank of America Building
1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 900
Bakersfield, CA 93301-5230
Tel: (661) 322-6023 Fax: (661) 322-3508
Attorneys for Defendant,
NORTH BAKERSFIELD NISSAN, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
***
11
MARGARET ROUX,
12
CASE NO. 1:18-cv-01087-DAD-JLT
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
NORTH BAKERSFIELD NISSAN, INC.,
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT;
ORDER
(Doc. 13)
Plaintiff MARGARET ROUX (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant NORTH BAKERSFIELD NISSAN,
INC. (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Initial Complaint
(“Complaint”) as follows:
20
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served her Initial Complaint on October 29, 2018, making Defendant’s
21
response to the Complaint due on November 19, 2018;
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant previously agreed and stipulated to extend the time by which
23
Defendant shall respond to the Complaint to December 5, 2018;
24
///
25
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant are discussing the possibility of settlement which would
26
result in a dismissal of the lawsuit;
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER
1
2
WHEREAS, on or about December 3, 2018, the Court continued the Scheduling Conference in
this matter to January 22, 2019; and,
3
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant agree and stipulate to extend the time by which Defendant
4
shall respond to the Complaint 21 calendar day, to December 26, 2018, to allow the parties additional time
5
to attempt to resolve the case without incurring additional fees and costs.
6
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of
7
record, that Defendant’s date to respond to the Complaint, by answer, motion, or otherwise, is extended
8
for twenty-one (21) days, to and including December 26, 2018.
9
10
DATED: December 3, 2018
CLIFFORD & BROWN
11
By /s/ Nicholas J. Street, Esq.
NICHOLAS J. STREET, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant,
NORTH BAKERSFIELD NISSAN, INC.
12
13
14
15
16
DATED: December 3, 2018
KAZEROUNI KAW GROUP, APC
17
18
19
20
By /s/ Matthew Loker, Esq.
ABBAS KAZEROUNIAN, ESQ.
MATTHEW LOKER, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
MARGARET ROUX
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER
ORDER
1
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Court GRANTS the request of the defendant to delay
2
its responsive pleading to no later than December 26, 2018.
3
The Court will not entertain any further requests for extensions of time for the responsive
4
pleading.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 5, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?