Roux v. North Bakersfield Nissan, Inc.
Filing
19
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/22/2019. Pleading Amendment Deadline 4/22/2019. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 2/5/2019; Non-Expert 10/11/2019; Expert 12/13/2019. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 6/13/2019 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 12/20/2019; Hearing by 1/17/2020. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 2/7/2020; Hearing by 3/13 /2020. Pretrial Conference set for 4/24/2020 at 10:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Jury Trial set for 6/8/2020 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARGARET ROUX,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
NORTH BAKERSFIELD NISSAN, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
Case No.: 1:18-CV-1087- JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 4/22/2019
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 2/5/2019
Non-Expert: 10/11/2019
Expert: 12/13/2019
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
6/13/2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 12/20/2019
Hearing: 1/17/2020
19
20
21
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 2/7/2020
Hearing: 3/13/2020
22
23
Pre-Trial Conference:
4/24/2020 at 10:00 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
24
25
Trial: 6/8/2020 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
Jury trial: 3-4 days
26
27
28
1
1
I.
January 22, 2018.
2
3
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Appearances of Counsel
4
Elizabeth Wagner appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.
5
Nicholas Street appeared on behalf of Defendant.
6
III.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
7
8
motion to amend, no later than April 22, 2019.
9
IV.
10
11
12
13
14
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before February 5, 2019.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before
October 11, 2019, and all expert discovery on or before December 13, 2019.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or October 25, 2019, and
15
to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before November 15, 2019. The written designation of retained
16
and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C)
17
and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance
18
with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such
19
experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
20
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
21
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
22
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
23
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
24
25
26
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for June 13, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. before the
27
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
28
California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the
2
1
conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
2
The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be
3
completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this
4
order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-8511 and entering Access Code
5
1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the
6
intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.
7
V.
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
8
9
10
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
than December 20, 2019, and heard on or before January 17, 2020. The Court hears non-dispositive
motions at 9:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.
No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it
11
12
is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written
13
discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party
14
with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by
15
agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly
16
shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the
17
obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule
18
this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at
19
(661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251
20
with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped
21
from the Court’s calendar.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than February 7, 2020, and heard no
22
23
later than March 13, 2020, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge,
24
at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions,
25
counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.
26
VI.
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
27
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
28
adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues
3
1
to be raised in the motion.
2
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
3
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole
4
or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the
5
issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the
6
expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
7
8
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of
9
undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be
10
deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint
11
statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion, the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and
12
13
conferred as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.
14
Failure to comply may result in the motion being stricken.
15
VII.
16
17
18
Pre-Trial Conference
April 24, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., located at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield,
California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
19
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
20
directly to Judge Thurston's chambers, by email at JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
21
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
22
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
23
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
24
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
25
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
26
VIII. Trial Date
27
28
June 8, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California,
before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
4
1
A.
This is a jury trial.
2
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 3-4 days.
3
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
4
California, Rule 285.
5
IX.
Settlement Conference
6
If the parties desire a conference with the Court, they may file a joint written request for a
7
settlement conference, including proposed dates with approximately 60 days’ notice. Alternatively, the
8
parties may file a joint written request for referral to the Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution
9
Program.
10
X.
11
Trial
Not applicable at this time.
12
13
XI.
16
Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.
14
15
Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to Shorten
XII.
Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
17
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
18
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its
19
increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil
20
Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.
21
XIII. Effect of this Order
22
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
23
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
24
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
25
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
26
subsequent status conference.
27
28
The dates set in this order are firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good
cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations extending the deadlines
5
1
contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations,
2
and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief
3
requested.
4
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 22, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?