(HC) Cuevas v. Sullivan
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING 28 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to DENY Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and Petitioner's Motion for Stay signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/11/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE LUIS KELLY CUEVAS,
Petitioner,
12
13
14
v.
J. SULLIVAN,
Case No. 1:18-cv-01281-LJO-JDP
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AND PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR STAY
ECF Nos. 26, 28
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner Jose Luis Kelly Cuevas, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas
18
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 8. The court has referred this matter to a magistrate
19
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On August 19, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations
21
that the court deny respondent’s motion to dismiss and petitioner’s motion for stay. ECF No. 28.
22
Petitioner has filed timely objections. ECF No. 32.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
24
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
25
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
26
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
27
1.
28
The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on August 19,
2019, ECF No. 28, are adopted in full;
1
1
2.
Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 19, is denied;
2
3.
Petitioner’s motion for stay, ECF No. 26, is denied;
3
4.
Respondent’s motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 31, is denied; and
4
5.
The matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings and
briefing on the merits.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
September 11, 2019
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?