Beltran et al v. Olam Spices and Vegetables, Inc.
Filing
16
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE from 10/15/2019 to 11/5/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file either a joint scheduling report, or if a further continuance of the mandatory scheduling conference is required, a joint status report, seven (7) days prior to the scheduling conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/10/2019. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THOMAS BELTRAN, et al.,
Case No. 1:18-cv-01676-LJO-SAB
Plaintiffs,
12
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
v.
13
(ECF No. 15)
14
OLAM SPICES AND VEGETABLES, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
On September 18, 2019, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court continued the
18 scheduling conference in this matter until October 15, 2019, and ordered the parties to file a joint
19 scheduling report one week prior to the continued date. (ECF No. 14.) On October 9, 2019, the
20 parties filed a status report in which they inform the Court that the parties have reached a
21 proposed settlement but require additional time to finalize a motion for preliminary approval, and
22 seek a three-week continuance of the scheduling conference. (ECF No. 15.)
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
Accordingly, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 15), the mandatory scheduling
1
2 conference is HEREBY CONTINUED to November 5, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. IT
3 IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file either a joint scheduling report, or if a further
4 continuance of the mandatory scheduling conference is required, a joint status report, seven (7)
5 days prior to the scheduling conference.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated:
October 10, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?