Smithee et al v. California Correctional Institution et al
Filing
111
ORDER re 110 Second Stipulation to Keep Discovery Open for Limited Purpose, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/7/2021. (Rivera, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
GREGORY J. BROD, CSB 184456
BROD LAW FIRM, P.C.
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone (415) 397-1130
Facsimile (415) 397-2121
JEFFREY LIPMAN, ISB 9759
LIPMAN LAW FIRM, P.C.
1454 30th Street, Suite 205
Des Moines, Iowa 50266
Telephone (515) 276-3411
Facsimile (525) 276-3736
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DANA SMITHEE, E.M.,
a minor by and through guardian
ad litem JENNIFER MONTES
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DANA SMITHEE, “E.M.”, a minor, by and
through her guardian ad litem, JENNIFER
MONTES,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
RHONDA LITT-STONER, PRATAP
)
NARAYAN, M.D., JENNIFER SEYMOUR, )
KARIN CELOSSE,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT
SECOND STIPULATION AND
PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP
DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED
PURPOSE
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED
PURPOSE: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT
1
1
Plaintiffs DANA SMITHEE, “E.M.”, a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem,
2
JENNIFER MONTES and Defendant KARIN CELOSSE, by and through their respective attorneys,
3
jointly stipulate to the following:
4
1) Following the deposition of Defendant KARIN CELOSSE, taken October 6, 2021,
5
Plaintiffs have determined they may dismiss Defendant CELOSSE, and amend their
6
7
8
9
10
complaint to add a different defendant.
2) The current discovery cut-off date is October 14, 2021 and plaintiffs’ depositions are
currently set for October 12, 2021.
3) To avoid the burden of taking those depositions unnecessarily, the parties hereby
11
stipulate and agree to extend the discovery cut-off date of October 14, 2021 to
12
13
November 24, 2021, for the limited purpose of taking plaintiffs’ depositions. In
14
addition, the deadline to respond to any currently outstanding written discovery
15
requests is extended to November 24, 2021. Fact discovery for any other purpose
16
closes on October 14, 2021, as scheduled.
17
18
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: October 7, 2021
BROD LAW FIRM, P.C.
20
21
22
By: ____/S/ Gregory J. Brod_________________
GREGORY J. BROD
23
24
25
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DANA SMITHEE, E.M.,
a minor by and through guardian
ad litem JENNIFER MONTES
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED
PURPOSE: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT
2
1
2
Dated: October 7, 2021
ROB BONTA
Attorney General of California
JON S. ALLIN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
3
4
5
6
By: _/S/ Jeremy Duggan__________
(per authority for electronic signature)
JEREMY DUGGAN
Attorneys for Defendant K. Celosse
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED
PURPOSE: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT
3
[Proposed] ORDER
1
2
3
4
Good cause appearing, the parties’ stipulation to keep discovery open for the limited
purpose of deposing plaintiffs, and to provide outstanding discovery responses, until November
24, 2021 is approved. Fact discovery for any other purpose closes on October 14, 2021, as
5
scheduled.
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 7, 2021
_ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED
PURPOSE: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?