Smithee et al v. California Correctional Institution et al

Filing 111

ORDER re 110 Second Stipulation to Keep Discovery Open for Limited Purpose, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/7/2021. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 GREGORY J. BROD, CSB 184456 BROD LAW FIRM, P.C. 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone (415) 397-1130 Facsimile (415) 397-2121 JEFFREY LIPMAN, ISB 9759 LIPMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. 1454 30th Street, Suite 205 Des Moines, Iowa 50266 Telephone (515) 276-3411 Facsimile (525) 276-3736 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DANA SMITHEE, E.M., a minor by and through guardian ad litem JENNIFER MONTES 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DANA SMITHEE, “E.M.”, a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, JENNIFER MONTES, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ) RHONDA LITT-STONER, PRATAP ) NARAYAN, M.D., JENNIFER SEYMOUR, ) KARIN CELOSSE, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED PURPOSE _____________________________________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED PURPOSE: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT 1 1 Plaintiffs DANA SMITHEE, “E.M.”, a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, 2 JENNIFER MONTES and Defendant KARIN CELOSSE, by and through their respective attorneys, 3 jointly stipulate to the following: 4 1) Following the deposition of Defendant KARIN CELOSSE, taken October 6, 2021, 5 Plaintiffs have determined they may dismiss Defendant CELOSSE, and amend their 6 7 8 9 10 complaint to add a different defendant. 2) The current discovery cut-off date is October 14, 2021 and plaintiffs’ depositions are currently set for October 12, 2021. 3) To avoid the burden of taking those depositions unnecessarily, the parties hereby 11 stipulate and agree to extend the discovery cut-off date of October 14, 2021 to 12 13 November 24, 2021, for the limited purpose of taking plaintiffs’ depositions. In 14 addition, the deadline to respond to any currently outstanding written discovery 15 requests is extended to November 24, 2021. Fact discovery for any other purpose 16 closes on October 14, 2021, as scheduled. 17 18 19 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: October 7, 2021 BROD LAW FIRM, P.C. 20 21 22 By: ____/S/ Gregory J. Brod_________________ GREGORY J. BROD 23 24 25 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DANA SMITHEE, E.M., a minor by and through guardian ad litem JENNIFER MONTES 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED PURPOSE: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT 2 1 2 Dated: October 7, 2021 ROB BONTA Attorney General of California JON S. ALLIN Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 4 5 6 By: _/S/ Jeremy Duggan__________ (per authority for electronic signature) JEREMY DUGGAN Attorneys for Defendant K. Celosse 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED PURPOSE: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT 3 [Proposed] ORDER 1 2 3 4 Good cause appearing, the parties’ stipulation to keep discovery open for the limited purpose of deposing plaintiffs, and to provide outstanding discovery responses, until November 24, 2021 is approved. Fact discovery for any other purpose closes on October 14, 2021, as 5 scheduled. 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 7, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO KEEP DISCOVERY OPEN FOR LIMITED PURPOSE: Case No. 1:19-cv-0004 NONE JLT 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?