Smithee et al v. California Correctional Institution et al

Filing 114

ORDER DENYING 113 Stipulation to Amend the Case Schedule, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/15/2021. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 DANA SMITHEE, et al., 12 13 14 v. Case No. 1:19-cv-00004-NONE-JLT Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE (Doc. 110) CA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et al. 15 Defendant. 16 17 Since October 6, 2021, the plaintiff has indicated she intends to dismiss defendant Karen 18 Celosse from the action and to seek to amend her complaint (Doc. 110). Consequently, the Court 19 granted the stipulation submitted on October 7, 2021 to extend the non-expert discovery to 20 October 14, 2021 and to extend the deadline for Ms. Smithee to respond to the outstanding 21 discovery (Doc. 111). Despite the passage of more than a month. The parties have failed to 22 complete the dismissal and are, again, seeking to extend the deadline for the plaintiff to respond 23 to discovery requests, to take the deposition of the plaintiff and to disclose experts (Doc. 113). 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 They offer absolutely no explanation for their failure to complete this discovery or why 2 they have failed to comply with the amended deadlines the Court granted them at their request. 3 Consequently, the stipulation is DENIED. They SHALL complete discovery within the 4 current deadlines. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 15, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?