Smithee et al v. California Correctional Institution et al
Filing
91
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Certain Claims, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/20/2020. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANA SMITHEE, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
v.
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:19-cv-00004-NONE-JLT
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS
[FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE]
After Cyrus Ayers killed himself while in custody, his child, E.M. and his mother, Dana
18
Smithee, filed this lawsuit. They allege Ayers was not provided proper medical care during his
19
incarceration at the California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi and this resulted in his death. In
20
their fourth amended complaint, Plaintiffs claim that Defendant Litt-Stoner, Chief Executive Officer
21
for Health Care Services at CCI, Defendant Narayan, Chief Psychiatrist at CCI, and Defendants
22
Seymour and Celosse, psychologists at CCI, are liable for Ayers’ death. (Doc. 65.)
23
On January 30, 2020, Defendants Litt-Stoner, Narayan, Seymour, and Celosse moved the
24
Court to dismiss the action. (Docs. 66, 67.) The Court dismissed Defendants Narayan, Seymour, and
25
Litt-Stoner from the action, and denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ survival claim
26
against Celosse based on Ayers’ Eighth Amendment rights and Plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment
27
claim. (Doc. 88.) The Court also dismissed with leave to amend Plaintiffs’ wrongful death claims
28
against Celosse. (Id.)
1
1
On September 17, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a notice of election not to amend the fourth amended
2
complaint and to proceed on their survival claim against Celosse based on Ayers’ Eighth Amendment
3
Rights and their Fourteenth Amendment claim. (Doc. 90 at 2.)
RECOMMENDATION
4
5
Based upon the foregoing, the Court RECOMMENDS:
6
1.
Plaintiffs’ wrongful death claims against Defendant Celosse be DISMISSED; and
7
2.
Defendant Celosse be required to file an answer within SIXTY DAYS of this order
becoming final.
8
9
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
10
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 304 of the Local
11
Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. Within fourteen
12
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiffs may file written
13
objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
14
Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiffs are advised that failure to file objections within the
15
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d
16
1153 (9th Cir. 1991); Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 834 (9th Cir. 2014).
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 20, 2020
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?