Cavazos v. Salas Concrete, Inc.

Filing 21

Stipulation and Order to continue Initial Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/10/2019. Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/29/2019 has been CONTINUED to 12/3/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Rosales, O.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Anthony P. Raimondo, #200387 apr@raimondoassociates.com Gerardo V. Hernandez, #292809 gvh@raimondoassociates.com James D. Miller, #207709 jdm@raimondoassociates.com RAIMONDO & ASSOCIATES, a Law Corporation 7110 N. Marks Avenue, Suite #104 Fresno, California 93711 Telephone: (559) 432-3000; Fax: (559) 432-2242 6 Attorneys for Defendant SALAS CONCRETE, INC. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 David G. Spivak, # 179684 david@spivaklaw.com Maralle Messrelian, #316974 maralle@spivaklaw.com THE SPIVAK LAW FIRM 16530 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 203 Encino, CA 91436 Telephone: (818) 582-3086; Facsimile: (818) 582-2561 Walter Haines, #71075 walter@uelglaw.com UNITED EMPLOYEES LAW GROUP 5500 Bolsa Ave., Suite 201 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Telephone: (562) 256-1047; Fax: (562) 256-1006 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN CAVAZOS, and all others similarly situated 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 JOHN CAVAZOS, on behalf of himself, all 21 others similarly situated, and the general public, and as an “aggrieved employee” on 22 behalf of other “aggrieved employees” under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act 23 of 2004, 24 Plaintiff(s), Case No. 1:19-cv-00062-DAD-EPG STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF No. 20) vs. 25 SALAS CONCRETE, INC., a California 26 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 27 Defendant(s). 28 -1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 Plaintiff JOHN CAVAZOS on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and Defendant 2 SALAS CONCRETE, INC., both through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as 3 follows: 4 WHEREAS, the Initial Scheduling Conference is currently scheduled for October 29, 2019; and 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant believe that good cause exists to continue the Initial 6 Scheduling Conference because the Parties have agreed to participate in early mediation on November 7 6, 2019, and thereafter, depending on the outcome of that mediation, would be better able to discuss the 8 scheduling and outstanding anticipated issues related to the case. 9 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant hereby request that the Court continue the Initial 10 Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for October 29, 2019, to a date after the mediation 11 scheduled for November 6, 2019. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 Dated: October 8, 2019 16 RAIMONDO & ASSOCIATES, a LAW CORP. By: 17 18 19 Dated: October 8, 2019 /s/ James D. Miller James Miller, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant SALAS CONCRETE, INC. THE SPIVAK LAW FIRM 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ Maralle Messrelian David G. Spivak, Esq. Maralle Messrelian, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN CAVAZOS, et al. 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 20), and finding good cause exists, IT IS 3 ORDERED that the Initial Scheduling Conference, currently scheduled for October 29, 2019, is 4 continued to December 3, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 10, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?