(PC) Carter v. California Correctional Institution et al

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING 11 Motion for Order notifying the Los Angeles Sheriff's that he is proceeding In Forma Pauperis ; ORDER GRANTING 13 Motion for a copy of Civil Docket;ORDER GRANTING 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/7/2020. (30-Day Deadline) (Copy of Docket mailed to Plaintiff as Ordered) (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 KEITH-REAGAN CARTER,

Case No. 1:19-cv-0358-JLT (PC)

12

Plaintiff,

13

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE;

v.

14 CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR COPY OF CIVIL DOCKET;
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR AN ORDER TO NOTIFY OFFICIALS
THAT HE IS PROCEEDING IN PRO PER
(Docs. 11, 13, 17)
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

19
20

Plaintiff moves for an extension of time to file his response to the Court’s August 7, 2020,

21 Screening Order. (Doc. 17.) Good cause appearing, this motion is granted.
22

Plaintiff also moves for an order notifying the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department that he is

23 proceeding in this action in propria persona and is entitled to certain privileges as outlined in Rule
24 8.42(d) of the Los Angeles County Superior Court Rules, to include additional library time and
25 telephone privileges. (Doc. 11.) Relatedly, Plaintiff seeks a copy of the court docket to show
26 institutional staff that he is proceeding in pro per. Though Plaintiff is indeed proceeding in this
27 action without legal representation, Rule 8.42(d) concerns privileges afforded to criminal
28 defendants who are proceeding in pro per. It does not appear that Rule 842(d) would apply to this
1

1 civil action.
2

Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows:

3

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file

4

his response to the Screening Order within thirty days from the date of this order;

5

2. Plaintiff’s motion for an order notifying the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department that he is

6

proceeding in forma pauperis and that he is entitled to indigent legal supplies (Doc. 11)

7

is DENIED; and

8

3. Plaintiff’s motion for a copy of the civil docket (Doc. 13) is GRANTED. The Clerk of

9

Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the docket in this case.

10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 7, 2020

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2