(PC) Carter v. California Correctional Institution et al

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING 11 Motion for Order notifying the Los Angeles Sheriff's that he is proceeding In Forma Pauperis ; ORDER GRANTING 13 Motion for a copy of Civil Docket;ORDER GRANTING 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/7/2020. (30-Day Deadline) (Copy of Docket mailed to Plaintiff as Ordered) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH-REAGAN CARTER, Case No. 1:19-cv-0358-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE; v. 14 CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COPY OF CIVIL DOCKET; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO NOTIFY OFFICIALS THAT HE IS PROCEEDING IN PRO PER (Docs. 11, 13, 17) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 19 20 Plaintiff moves for an extension of time to file his response to the Court’s August 7, 2020, 21 Screening Order. (Doc. 17.) Good cause appearing, this motion is granted. 22 Plaintiff also moves for an order notifying the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department that he is 23 proceeding in this action in propria persona and is entitled to certain privileges as outlined in Rule 24 8.42(d) of the Los Angeles County Superior Court Rules, to include additional library time and 25 telephone privileges. (Doc. 11.) Relatedly, Plaintiff seeks a copy of the court docket to show 26 institutional staff that he is proceeding in pro per. Though Plaintiff is indeed proceeding in this 27 action without legal representation, Rule 8.42(d) concerns privileges afforded to criminal 28 defendants who are proceeding in pro per. It does not appear that Rule 842(d) would apply to this 1 1 civil action. 2 Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows: 3 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file 4 his response to the Screening Order within thirty days from the date of this order; 5 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an order notifying the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department that he is 6 proceeding in forma pauperis and that he is entitled to indigent legal supplies (Doc. 11) 7 is DENIED; and 8 3. Plaintiff’s motion for a copy of the civil docket (Doc. 13) is GRANTED. The Clerk of 9 Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of the docket in this case. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 7, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?