(PC) Hammler v. Clark et al
Filing
127
ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 116 , 121 signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/13/2021. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALLEN HAMMLER,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
CLARK, et.al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:19-cv-00373-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
([ECF Nos. 116, 121)
Plaintiff Allen Hammler is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
19
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On March 26, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation
22
recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (ECF No. 121.) The
23
Findings and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due
24
within fourteen (14) days. (Id.) On April 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections. (ECF No. 122.)
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
26
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections,
27
the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendation filed on March 26, 2021, is adopted in full; and
3
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, filed on January 22, 2021 (ECF No. 116) is
denied.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
May 13, 2021
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?