(PC) Hammler v. Clark et al
Filing
40
ORDER for California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to SHOW CAUSE why Sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court's July 10, 2019, ORDER,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/21/2019. Show Cause Response due 20-Day Deadline. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALLEN HAMMLER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
CLARK, et.al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:19-cv-00373-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER FOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD
NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH THE COURT’S JULY 10, 2019, ORDER
[ECF No. 34]
Plaintiff Allen Hammler is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
On July 16, 2019, the Court found that service of the complaint was appropriate as to
21
Defendants Gamboa, Peterson, Garza, Saucedo, Uhlik and Clark for violation of the First Amendment,
22
and electronic service was ordered, which directed the California Department of Corrections and
23
Rehabilitation (CDCR) to “file with the Court the ‘CDCR Notice of E-Service Waiver’ advising the
24
Court which defendant(s) … will be waiving service of process without the need for personal service
25
by the United States Marshal.” (ECF No. 34, Order at 2:27-3:1.) However, CDCR has not returned
26
the Notice of E-Service waiver and the forty day time period has expired.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty (20) days CDCR shall show cause
2
why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court’s July 10, 2019, order. The
3
Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Monica
4
Anderson, at monica.anderson@doj.ca.gov.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
August 21, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?