(PC) Hammler v. Clark et al
Filing
71
ORDER ADOPTING 39 Findings and Recommendations, and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction re 37 , 38 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/20/20. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALLEN HAMMLER,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
CLARK, et.al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:19-cv-00373-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
[ECF Nos. 37, 38, 39]
Plaintiff Allen Hammler is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
19
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On August 22, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation
22
recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction be denied. (ECF No. 39.) The
23
Findings and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due
24
within fourteen days. (Id.) Plaintiff filed timely objections on September 16, 2019.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
26
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections,
27
the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendation filed on August 22, 2019, is adopted in full; and
3
2.
Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction, filed on August 16, 2019 (ECF Nos. 37
& 38), are DENIED.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
February 20, 2020
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?