H. et al v. United States of America

Filing 33

Stipulation and Order to continue scheduling conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/14/2020. (Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/28/2020 has been CONTINUED to 1/6/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean) signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/14/2020. (Rosales, O.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 C.H., et al., No. 1:19-cv-00435-DAD-EPG 11 12 Plaintiffs, v. 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Defendant. Current Scheduling Conference: Oct. 28, 2020 Proposed Scheduling Conference: Jan. 6, 2021 1 2 STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties and subject to Court approval, that 3 the Scheduling Conference in this matter shall be continued from October 28, 2020, to January 6, 2021, 4 to allow time for the Court to resolve Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. See ECF Nos. 15–22. 5 6 Dated: October 8, 2020 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney 7 8 By: 9 /s/ Joseph B. Frueh JOSEPH B. FRUEH Assistant United States Attorney 10 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 11 BARADAT & PABOOJIAN, INC. 12 13 14 15 By: /s/ Kevin B. Kalajian KEVIN B. KALAJIAN DANIEL R. BARADAT Attorneys for Plaintiffs C.H., et al. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 30 (authorized 10/8/2020) 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation filed October 14, 2020 (ECF No. 32), it is HEREBY 3 ORDERED that the initial scheduling conference in this matter shall be continued from October 28, 4 2020, to January 6, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 14, 2020 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 30

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?