Zetz et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Filing
107
STIPULATION and ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule for Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motions to Exclude Expert Opinions of Darryl R. Zengler, Michael T. Margolis, M.D., Robert J. Tremp, Jr., Jimmy Mays, PH.D, Ie-Ming Shih, M.D., PH.D. , and Peggy Pence, PH.D, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/2/2022. Opposition to be filed on or before 8/12/2022. Reply to be filed on or before 8/29/2022. The Hearing on this matter is reset to 10/17/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Rivera, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Christopher B. Dolan (CA Bar No. 065358)
THE DOLAN LAW FIRM
1438 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: 213-347-3529
Chris@dolanlawfirm.com
Sheila M. Bossier (MSB 10618) Pro Hac Vice
Laurel Li Harris (MSB 104078) Pro Hac Vice
BOSSIER & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
1520 North State Street
Jackson, MS 39202
Telephone: (601) 352-5450
Facsimile: (601) 352-5452
sbossier@bossier-law.com
lharris@bossier-law.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
Autumn Zetz and Eric Zetz,
Plaintiffs,
16
17
v.
18
Boston Scientific Corp., and Does 1-30,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
US.351503478.01
Case No. 1:19-cv-00451-AWI-SAB
Hon. Anthony W. Ishii
Hon. Stanley A. Boone
STIPULATION and ORDER SETTING
BREIFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT
OPINIONS OF DARRYL R.
ZENGLER, MICHAEL T. MARGOLIS,
M.D., ROBERT J. TREMP, JR.,
JIMMY MAYS, PH.D., IE-MING SHIH,
M.D., PH.D., and PEGGY PENCE,
PH.D.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TO:
Defendant Boston Scientific Corp.
By and through its attorneys of record:
Karen M. Firstenberg, Esq.
Tarifa B. Laddon, Esq.
FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
1800 Century Park East, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, CA 90067
karen.firstenberg@faegredrinker.com
tarifa.laddon@faegredrinker.com
Plaintiffs Autumn Zetz and Eric Zetz (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Boston Scientific
Corporation (“BSC”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 104) and
Motion(s) to Exclude the Case-Specific Opinions of Plaintiffs’ Experts Michael T.
Margolis, M.D. (Docket No. 98), Jimmy Mays, PH.D. (Docket No. 99), Peggy Pence, PH.D.
(Docket No. 100), Robert J. Tremp, Jr. (Docket No. 101), Darryl R. Zengler (Docket No.
102) and Ie-Ming Shih, M.D., PH.D. (Docket No. 103) are due to be filed on or before
August 12, 2022.
2. Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment and Motions to Exclude
the Case-Specific Opinions of Plaintiffs’ Experts Michael T. Margolis, M.D. (Docket No.
98), Jimmy Mays, PH.D. (Docket No. 99), Peggy Pence, PH.D. (Docket No. 100), Robert
J. Tremp, Jr. (Docket No. 101), Darryl R. Zengler (Docket No. 102) and Ie-Ming Shih,
M.D., PH.D. (Docket No. 103) are due to be filed on or before August 29, 2022.
16
17
3. The Hearing on this matter is reset to: October 17, 2022.
18
This is the first request for an extension of time regarding these matters.
19
DATED: August 1, 2022
/s/ Laurel Li Harris
Sheila M. Bossier, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
Laurel Li Harris (admitted pro hac vice)
BOSSIER & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
1520 North State Street
Jackson, MS 39202
Tel.: (601) 352-5450
Fax: (601) 352-5452
sbossier@bossier-law.com
lharris@bossier-law.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
STIPULATION and ORDER RESETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
US.351503478.01
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
/s/ Karen Firstenberg
Karen M. Firstenberg, Esq.
Tarifa B. Laddon, Esq.
FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
1800 Century Park East, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, CA 90067
karen.firstenberg@faegredrinker.com
tarifa.laddon@faegredrinker.com
Attorneys for Defendants
8
ORDER
9
Pursuant to stipulation,
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated: August 2, 2022
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
STIPULATION and ORDER RESETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
US.351503478.01
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?