Zetz et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Filing 50

***VACATED PER ORDER #54 ***ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO QUASH. DEADLINE: NOVEMBER 18, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/16/2020(Hernandez, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AUTUMN ZETZ, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO
FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO QUASH

v.

13
14

Case No. 1:19-cv-00451-AWI-SAB

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION,

15

DEADLINE: NOVEMBER 18, 2020

Defendant.

16
17

Autumn Zetz and Eric Zetz (”Plaintiffs”) filed this action against Boston Scientific

18 Corporation in the Superior Court for the State of California, Fresno County. (ECF No. 1-1.)
19 On April 12, 2019, Defendant removed the action to the Eastern District of California. (ECF No.
20 1.) The matter was related to other similar pending actions and reassigned to Senior Judge
21 Anthony W. Ishii and the undersigned. (ECF No. 1.)
22

On November 4, 2020, Defendant served a subpoena to produce documents and for the

23 deposition of Plaintiffs’ expert, le-Ming Shih. (ECF No. 49-1.) The deposition was scheduled
24 for November 16, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. (Id.) On November 13, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a motion to
25 quash the service of the subpoena. (ECF No. 49.)
26

The Court shall order Defendant to file a response to the motion to quash. If after

27 considering the pleadings, it is deemed necessary a hearing will be scheduled on the motion.
28 / / /

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file a response to

1

2 Plaintiffs’ motion to quash on or before November 18, 2020.
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 Dated:

November 16, 2020
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2