(PC) Hunt v. Diaz et al
Filing
71
ORDER ADOPTING 70 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING Action Due to Plaintiff's Failure to Prosecute, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/6/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK HUNT,
12
No. 1:19-cv-00504-DAD-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
D. DIAZ, et al.,
15
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE
Defendants.
(Doc. No. 70)
16
17
Plaintiff Mark Hunt is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil
18
rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 2, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued the pending findings and
21
recommendations recommending dismissal of this action, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s
22
failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 70.) Those pending findings and recommendations were served
23
on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen
24
(14) days after service. (Id. at 5.) To date, no objections have been filed and the time in which to
25
do so has now passed.
26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a
27
de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings
28
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly:
2
1.
3
4
adopted in full;
2.
5
6
7
8
The findings and recommendations issued on November 2, 2021 (Doc. No. 70) are
This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute
this action; and
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 6, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?