Bowles v. Leprino Foods Company et al
Filing
66
ORDER of DISMISSAL of Plaintiff's Lawsuit without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 08/28/2024. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
STEVEN D. BOWLES on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
16
17
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S
LAWSUIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No. 1:19-cv-00635-JLT-BAM
v.
LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY, a
Colorado corporation, LEPRINO FOODS
DAIRY PRODUCTS COMPANY, a
Colorado corporation and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive,
Defendants.
19
20
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S LAWSUIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
1
On August 21, 2024, the parties in this action filed a stipulation of dismissal of
2
the action without prejudice, with each party to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc.
3
65.) The parties note that final approval was granted in Vazquez, et al. v. Leprino
4
Foods Company, et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-00796-JLT-BAM, and that the instant
5
Bowles lawsuit is completely subsumed by the Vasquez settlement. (Id. at 2.) The
6
parties further note that no notice has been provided to the putative class members in
7
the Bowles action, that they are unaware of any media attention given to the matter,
8
that there are no rapidly approaching statute of limitation issues, that there are no class
9
interests conceded, and that no notice need be provided to the putative class members
10
as those points were already provided for in the Vasquez matter. (Id.) The parties state
11
that dismissal of the matter will not prejudice the putative class members as the class
12
claims in this matter have already been approved or resolved in prior cases. (Id.)
13
In light of the stipulated dismissal, this action is terminated by operation of law
14
without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This Court
15
VACATES all pending dates and matters, including the status conference set for
16
September 11, 2024. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
August 28, 2024
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S LAWSUIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?