(PC)Howell v. Randolph et al
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING 22 Defendants' Motion to Opt Out of the ADR Project; ORDER Lifting Stay; and ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Issue Discovery and Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/14/2020. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 KAREEM J. HOWELL,
Case No. 1:19-cv-0735-NONE-JLT (PC)
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO OPTOUT OF THE ADR
PROJECT;
14 A. RANDOLPH, et al.,
ORDER LIFTING STAY; AND
15
16
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
ISSUE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING
ORDER
17
(Doc. 22)
18
Defendants.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights complaint
19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff brings a First Amendment retaliation claim against
20 Correctional Officers Rodriguez, Randolph, and Burnes, and a Fourteenth Amendment Due
21 Process claim against Rodriguez and Randolph. On October 14, 2020, defendants filed a motion
22 to opt out of the post-screening ADR project. After reviewing the motion, the Court finds good
23 cause to grant defendants’ motion. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
24
25
1. Defendants’ motion to opt out (Doc. 22) is GRANTED, and the stay of this action is
LIFTED;
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
1
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a Discovery and Scheduling Order in this case.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 14, 2020
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?