(PC) Pacheco v. Diaz et al
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations, and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/08/2019. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JESUS PACHECO,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
RALPH DIAZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:19-cv-00774-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
[ECF Nos. 1, 8]
Plaintiff Jesus Pacheco is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
19
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On September 4, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations
22
recommending that Plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction
23
be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that
24
objections were due within fourteen days. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has
25
expired.
26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
27
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
28
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
1
1
Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
and
3
4
The Findings and Recommendations filed on September 4, 2019, are adopted in full;
2.
Plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction is
denied.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
October 8, 2019
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?