(PC) Pacheco v. Diaz et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations, and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/08/2019. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESUS PACHECO, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00774-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF Nos. 1, 8] Plaintiff Jesus Pacheco is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On September 4, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations 22 recommending that Plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction 23 be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that 24 objections were due within fourteen days. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has 25 expired. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 27 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 28 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 1 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. and 3 4 The Findings and Recommendations filed on September 4, 2019, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction is denied. 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ October 8, 2019 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?