Mondrian et al v. Trius Trucking, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER SETTING THE HEARING DATE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL AND VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/11/2020. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK LLP Norman B. Blumenthal, Bar No. 68687 2 Kyle R. Nordrehaug, Bar No. 205975 Aparajit Bhowmik, Bar No. 248066 3 2255 Calle Clara La Jolla, CA 92037 858-551-1223 Fax No.: 858-551-1232 4 Telephone: 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class 6 7 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Matthew E. Farmer, Bar No. 190484 8 Irene V. Fitzgerald, Bar No. 266949 Vanessa M. Cohn, Bar No. 314619 9 5200 North Palm Avenue, Suite 302 Fresno, CA 93704 559-244-7500 Fax No.: 559-244-7525 10 Telephone: 11 Attorneys for Defendant 12 Trius Trucking, Inc., a California Corporation 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 AUGUSTUS MONDRIAN, and RHONDA Case No. 1:19-CV-00884-DAD-SKO JONES, individuals, on behalf of themselves, 18 and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, 19 20 Plaintiffs, vs. 21 TRIUS TRUCKING, INC., a California 22 23 24 Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendants. JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE Complaint Filed: May 10, 2016 1st Amended Complaint Filed: January 05, 2017 2nd Amended Complaint Filed: March 27, 2017 3rd Amended Complaint Filed: May 29, 2019 (Doc. 16) 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 1:19-CV-00884-DAD-SKO Joint Stipulation And Order to Set Motion for Preliminary Approval Briefing Schedule Plaintiffs AUGUSTUS MONDRIAN and RHONDA JONES, individuals, on 1 2 behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant 3 TRIUS TRUCKING, INC. (“Defendant”) hereby submit this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] 4 Order to set the Motion for Preliminary Approval briefing schedule and hearing date. WHEREAS, on June 27, 2019, Defendant filed a Notice of Removal of Civil 5 6 Action to Federal Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441, and 1446, in the United States 7 District Court for the Eastern District of California (Dkt. 1); WHEREAS, the parties’ first appearance before the Court was initially set for 8 9 October 29, 2019 (Dkt. 4); WHEREAS, on October 21, 2019, the parties notified the Court that they reached 10 11 a class-wide settlement of this matter and were finalizing the terms of a long-form settlement 12 agreement, after which Plaintiffs intended to file a motion for preliminary approval of class action 13 settlement (Dkt. 7); WHEREAS, the parties required more time than initially anticipated to finalize the 14 15 terms of the long-form settlement agreement (cf. Dkt. 7); WHEREAS, the parties circulated a final long-form settlement agreement for 16 17 review and signature, and initially anticipated the filing of a motion for preliminary approval of 18 class settlement within 60 days of January 21, 2020 (cf. Dkt. 10). WHEREAS, the parties required more time than initially anticipated to review the 19 20 long-form settlement agreement and prepare the Motion for Preliminary Approval, particularly in 21 light of the challenges posed by the ongoing COVID-19 public health crisis; WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred further regarding the status of this 22 23 action, next steps concerning review of the Motion for Preliminary Approval; and, WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that Plaintiffs will file the Motion for 24 25 Preliminary Approval by November, 2020 and respectfully request a hearing date regarding the 26 Motion for Preliminary Approval be set for December, 2020, or a date thereafter as is convenient 27 for the Court. 28 / / / 2 Case No. 1:19-CV-00884-DAD-SKO Joint Stipulation And Order to Set Motion for Preliminary Approval Briefing Schedule 1 NOW, THEREFORE, and subject to the Court’s approval, the parties stipulate and 2 agree to set the deadline to file the Motion for Preliminary Approval for November 13, 2020 and 3 to set the hearing date regarding the Motion for Preliminary Approval for December 11, 2020, or 4 a date thereafter convenient for the Court. 5 Dated: September 9, 2020 6 7 By: _/s/Victoria B. Rivapalacio_______________ Norman B. Blumenthal Kyle R. Nordrehaug Aparajit Bhowmik Victoria B. Rivapalacio Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class 8 9 10 11 BLUMENTHAL NORDREHAUG BHOWMIK DE BLOUW LLP Dated: September 9, 2020 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 12 13 14 15 By: __/s/Vanessa M. Cohn________________ Matthew E. Farmer Irene V. Fitzgerald Vanessa M. Cohn Attorneys for Defendant 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 1:19-CV-00884-DAD-SKO Joint Stipulation And Order to Set Motion for Preliminary Approval Briefing Schedule 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 AUGUSTUS MONDRIAN, and 4 RHONDA JONES, individuals, on behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all persons 5 similarly situated, 6 Plaintiffs, 7 vs. 8 TRIUS TRUCKING, INC., a California 9 Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive, Case No. 1:19-CV-00884-DAD-SKO ORDER SETTING THE HEARING DATE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL AND VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Complaint Filed: May 10, 2016 1st Amended Complaint Filed: January 05, 2017 2nd Amended Complaint Filed: March 27, 2017 3rd Amended Complaint Filed: May 29, 2019 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 Based on the above stipulation of the parties (Doc. 16), by and through their counsel of 14 15 16 17 record, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of class action settlement SHALL be filed no later than November 13, 2020, and SHALL be heard no later than December 16, 2020. It is further ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for September 17, 2020, is 18 19 hereby VACATED in light of the settlement. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: September 11, 2020 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case No. 1:19-CV-00884-DAD-SKO Joint Stipulation And Order to Set Motion for Preliminary Approval Briefing Schedule

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?