Sidhu v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/9/2020. The Court ORDERS the case schedule amended as follows: The parties SHALL complete all non-expert discovery no later than November 30, 2020. The parties SHALL complete all expert discovery no later than January 5, 2021. No other amendments to the case schedule are authorized. (Apodaca, P)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GURPREET SIDHU, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. Case No.: 1:19-CV-01020-AWI-JLT ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE (Doc. 16) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 The parties have stipulated to extend the discovery deadlines due to the inability to depose 18 19 certain witnesses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. (Doc. 16) It appears counsel are awaiting the 20 ability to depose these people in person. They are strongly encouraged to take the depositions 21 remotely because the Court will not again extend the deadlines. Thus, the Court ORDERS the case 22 schedule amended as follows: 1. 23 24 2020; 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 The parties SHALL complete all non-expert discovery no later than November 30, /// 1 1 2 2. The parties SHALL complete all expert discovery no later than January 5, 2021. No other amendments to the case schedule are authorized. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 9, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?