Sidhu v. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/9/2020. The Court ORDERS the case schedule amended as follows: The parties SHALL complete all non-expert discovery no later than November 30, 2020. The parties SHALL complete all expert discovery no later than January 5, 2021. No other amendments to the case schedule are authorized. (Apodaca, P)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GURPREET SIDHU,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
Case No.: 1:19-CV-01020-AWI-JLT
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE
(Doc. 16)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants.
17
The parties have stipulated to extend the discovery deadlines due to the inability to depose
18
19
certain witnesses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. (Doc. 16) It appears counsel are awaiting the
20
ability to depose these people in person. They are strongly encouraged to take the depositions
21
remotely because the Court will not again extend the deadlines. Thus, the Court ORDERS the case
22
schedule amended as follows:
1.
23
24
2020;
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
The parties SHALL complete all non-expert discovery no later than November 30,
///
1
1
2
2.
The parties SHALL complete all expert discovery no later than January 5, 2021.
No other amendments to the case schedule are authorized.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 9, 2020
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?