Verdin v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., et al.

Filing 9

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/13/2019. Pleading Amendment Deadline 2/10/2020. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 11/27/2019; Non-Expert 7/31/2020; Expert 10/9/2020. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 3/23/2020 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 10/27/2020; Hearing by 11/24/2020. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 12/15/2020; Hearing by 1/2 6/2021. Settlement Conference set for 6/8/2020 at 01:30 PM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 3/23/2021 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 5/18/2021 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

ADRIANA VERDIN,
Plaintiff,

11
12

v.

13

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1: 19-CV-01129 - LJO - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 2/10/2020
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 11/27/2019
Non-Expert: 7/31/2020
Expert: 10/9/2020
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
3/23/2020 at 8:30 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 10/27/2020
Hearing: 11/24/2020

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 12/15/2020
Hearing: 1/26/2021

20
21
22

Settlement Conference:
6/8/2020 at 1:30 p.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

23
24

Pre-Trial Conference:
3/23/2021 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4

25
26
27

Trial: 5/18/2021 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 3-4 days

28
1

1

I.

November 13, 2019.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Amy Ginsburg appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

5

Michael Gregg appeared on behalf of Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, USA.

6

Greg Prudian appeared on behalf of Defendant Downs North Bakersfield, Inc.

7

III.

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the adopted policy of the Fresno Division of the

8
9

Magistrate Judge Consent: Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set before a

10

District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older civil case

11

set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

12
13

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

14

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

15

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

16

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

17

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

18
19

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

20

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

21

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

22

District of California.
Therefore, within 10 days, the parties are directed to e-mail their consent or decline form

23
24

directly to the Clerk's Office to the attention of Roxanne Gonzalez at [e-mail].

25

The forms should not be filed or otherwise transmitted to the assigned District Judge or Magistrate

26

Judge.

27

IV.

28

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
2

1

motion to amend, no later than February 10, 2020.

2

V.

3
4
5
6
7

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before November 27, 2019.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before July 31,
2020 and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before October 9, 2020.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before August 14,

8

2020, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before September 11, 2020. The written designation of

9

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

10

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in

11

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

12

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

13

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

14

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

15

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

16

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

17
18
19

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for March 23, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. before the

20

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

21

California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the

22

conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to [e-mail].

23

The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs

24

to be completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set

25

forth in this order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing [phone] and entering

26

Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written

27
28

1
In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent evaluation, the evaluation SHALL occur
sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline, so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s opinions in this regard.

3

1

notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing

2

date.

3

VI.

4

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

5

than October 27, 20202 and heard on or before November 24, 2020. Non-dispositive motions are

6

heard before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States

7

Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.

8

No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

9

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

10

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

11

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

12

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

13

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

14

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

15

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at

16

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251

17

with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped

18

from the Court’s calendar.

19

Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-

20

8511 and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk

21

receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the

22

noticed hearing date.

23

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than December 15, 2020 and heard no

24

later than January 26, 2021, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,

25

United States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R.

26

Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

27
28

2
Non-dispositive motions related to non-expert discovery SHALL be filed within a reasonable time of discovery of
the dispute, but in no event later than 30 days after the expiration of the non-expert discovery deadline.

4

1

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

2

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

3

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

4

to be raised in the motion.

5

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

6

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

7

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

8

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

9

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

10
11

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

12

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

13

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

14

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion, the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and

15
16

conferred as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

17

Failure to comply may result in the motion being stricken.

18

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

19

March 23, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.

20

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

21

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

22

directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

23
24

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

25

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

26

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

27

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

28

///
5

1

IX.

May 18, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United

2
3

Trial Date3

States District Court Judge.

4

A.

This is a jury trial.

5

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 3-4 days.

6

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

7

California, Rule 285.

8

X.

9
10
11

Settlement Conference
A settlement conference is scheduled for 1:30 p.m. on June 8, 2020, located at 510 19th Street,

Bakersfield, California.
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case

12

shall appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full

13

authority to negotiate and settle the case on any reasonable terms4discussed at the conference.

14

Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement

15

conference. Set forth below are the procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in

16

conducting the conference.

17

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via

18

fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful5 settlement demand which includes a

19

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the

20

settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or

21

with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is

22

appropriate. The parties SHALL continue to exchange counteroffers until it is no longer

23
24

Counsel are advised that Judge O’Neill has announced that he will retire from the Court in January 2020. The
case will be reassigned, but it is unlikely the trial will occur until Judge O’Neill’s replacement is selected. In recent times,
this process has taken up to three years to occur.
4
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like may be represented by
a person whose recommendations about settlement are relied upon by the ultimate decision makers.
5
“Meaningful” means the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party.
If, however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this
should trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing the
settlement conference via stipulation.
3

25
26
27
28

6

1

productive.
If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to

2
3

their Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents

4

shall not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

5

At least five court days before the settlement conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

6
7

Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

8

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

9

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

10

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

11

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

12

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

13

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

14

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon

15

which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of

16

prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

17

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

18

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and

20

E.

The relief sought.

21

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history

19

trial.

of past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

22
23

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

24

Techniques to Shorten Trial

25

Not applicable at this time.

26

XII.

There are no pending related matters.

27
28

Related Matters Pending

///
7

1
2

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

3

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

4

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

5

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal

6

Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

7

XIV. Effect of this Order

8
9

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

10

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

11

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

12

subsequent status conference.

13

The dates set in this order are firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good

14

cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations extending the deadlines

15

contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations,

16

and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief

17

requested.

18

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

19
20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 13, 2019

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
8