Karpenko v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
Filing
52
ORDER Regarding Joint Status Report and 51 Motion to Extend Stay signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/13/2021.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARIYA KARPENKO,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:19-cv-01317-DAD-BAM
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING JOINT STATUS
REPORT AND MOTION TO EXTEND
STAY
v.
C R BARD INCORPORATED, et al.,
(Doc. 51)
Defendants.
16
17
18
On January 19, 2021, following a notice of settlement, the Court directed the parties to
19 file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety no later than April 15,
20 2021. The parties were informed that if they required additional time to submit dispositional
21 documents, then they could file a request for an extension supported by good cause. (Doc. 46.)
22 On April 13, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Status Report and Motion to Extend Stay. (Doc. 47.)
23 The Court granted the motion to stay and directed the parties to file dispositive documents no
24 later than July 14, 2021. (Doc. 48.) The parties were again informed that if they required
25 additional time, they could file a request for an extension supported by good cause. (Id.) On
26 July 13, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Status Report and Motion to Extend Stay. (Doc. 49.)
27 The Court granted the motion and directed the parties to file dispositive documents no later
28
1
1 than October 15, 2021. (Doc. 50.) The parties again were informed that if they required
2 additional time, they could file a request for an extension supported by good cause. (Id.)
3
On October 12, 2021, the parties filed the instant Joint Status Report and Motion to
4 Extend Stay. (Doc. 51.) The parties request that the Court allow the stay to remain in place for
5 an additional ninety (90) days to allow time for the parties to finalize the terms of the
6 settlement. The parties explain that they are continuing to work to execute the specific terms of
7 the settlement and that Plaintiff Mariya Karpenko will dismiss the complaint when the
8 settlement is finalized. Plaintiff’s claim is part of an aggregate settlement for multiple plaintiffs.
9 (Id. at 1-2.)
10
The Court construes the parties’ motion as a request to extend the deadline to file
11 dispositional documents. Having considered the parties’ request, and good cause appearing,
12 the deadline for the parties to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its
13 entirety is HEREBY EXTENDED to January 13, 2022. If the parties require additional time
14 to submit dispositional documents, then they may file a request for an extension supported by
15 good cause. Local Rule 160. Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the
16 imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See
17 Local Rules 160, 172.
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
October 13, 2021
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?