(PC) Camposeco v. Boudreaux et al

Filing 35

ORDER DISCHARGING 33 Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/7/2021. Defendants' reply, if any, to Plaintiff's opposition to the motion to dismiss is due within seven (7) days from the date of filing of the opposition. (Rivera, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAMUEL CAMPOSECO,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:19-cv-01330-AWI-BAM (PC)
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

BOUDREAUX, et al.,
(ECF No. 31)
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff Samuel Camposeco (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in

18

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on

19

Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Stamper and Jones for violation of the

20

First and Sixth Amendments for reading Plaintiff’s legal mail outside of Plaintiff’s presence and

21

confiscating the legal mail.

22

On April 27, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 31.) Following

23

Plaintiff’s failure to timely file an opposition, on June 3, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show

24

cause by written response why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to

25

prosecute. (ECF No. 33.) Plaintiff was informed that he may comply with the Court’s order by

26

filing an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Id. at 2.)

27
28

On June 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed an opposition, dated May 24, 2021, to Defendants’ motion
to dismiss. (ECF No. 34.) Although it appears Plaintiff’s opposition was mailed before he
1

1

received the Court’s order to show cause, the Court accepts the opposition as filed in response to

2

the order to show cause.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

4

1. The June 3, 2021 order to show cause, (ECF No. 33), is DISCHARGED; and

5

2. Defendants’ reply, if any, to Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss is due within

6

seven (7) days from the date of filing of the opposition.

7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

June 7, 2021

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2