(PC) Legare v. Burden et al

Filing 4

ORDER DENYING as MOOT Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Exemption of E-Filing Complaint with Request for Clerk to File Complaint for Assignment, Screening and other Related Proceedings signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/3/2019. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 JASON PAUL LEGARE, 9 10 v. 11 E. BURDEN, et al., 12 13 Case No. 1:19-cv-01375-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXEMPTION OF E-FILING COMPLAINT WITH REQUEST FOR CLERK TO FILE COMPLAINT FOR ASSIGNMENT, SCREENING AND OTHER RELATED PROCEEDINGS Defendants. (ECF NO. 2) 14 15 Jason Legare (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action 16 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on 17 October 1, 2019. (ECF No. 1). On that same day Plaintiff filed a motion for an exemption of e- 18 filing complaint with request for Clerk of Court to file complaint for assignment, screening and 19 other related proceedings. (ECF No. 2). 20 Plaintiff’s complaint has been filed and assigned to the undersigned for screening and 21 related proceedings.1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 2) is 22 DENIED as moot.2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: October 3, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 1 2 28 A district judge will likely be assigned at a later date. The Court will address Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?