(PC) Legare v. Burden et al
Filing
4
ORDER DENYING as MOOT Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Exemption of E-Filing Complaint with Request for Clerk to File Complaint for Assignment, Screening and other Related Proceedings signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/3/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
JASON PAUL LEGARE,
9
10
v.
11
E. BURDEN, et al.,
12
13
Case No. 1:19-cv-01375-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXEMPTION
OF E-FILING COMPLAINT WITH
REQUEST FOR CLERK TO FILE
COMPLAINT FOR ASSIGNMENT,
SCREENING AND OTHER RELATED
PROCEEDINGS
Defendants.
(ECF NO. 2)
14
15
Jason Legare (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action
16
filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on
17
October 1, 2019. (ECF No. 1). On that same day Plaintiff filed a motion for an exemption of e-
18
filing complaint with request for Clerk of Court to file complaint for assignment, screening and
19
other related proceedings. (ECF No. 2).
20
Plaintiff’s complaint has been filed and assigned to the undersigned for screening and
21
related proceedings.1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 2) is
22
DENIED as moot.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated:
October 3, 2019
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
1
2
28
A district judge will likely be assigned at a later date.
The Court will address Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?