Earth Island Institute, et al. v. Nash, et al.

Filing 58

ORDER GRANTING 56 & 57 Pro Hac Vice Applications of Meriel Darzen and Ralph Bloemers, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/10/2019. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 Case No. 1:19-cv-01420-DAD-SAB ORDER GRANTING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS OF MERIEL DARZEN AND RALPH BLOEMERS v. 14 KIMBERLY NASH, et al., 15 (ECF Nos. 56, 57) Defendants. 16 17 Currently before the Court are the applications of Meriel Darzen and Ralph Bloemers, 18 attorneys for Plaintiffs Earth Island Institute, Sequoia ForestKeeper, and Greenpeace Inc., for 19 their admission to practice Pro Hac Vice under the provisions of Local Rule 180(b)(2) of the 20 Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for this District. (ECF Nos. 56, 57.) 21 The Court has reviewed the applications and notes that both applicants have checked the box 22 indicating that they have concurrently or within the preceding year made a Pro Hac Vice 23 application to this Court. (Id.) However, the applicants do not list the case numbers for these 24 applications. (Id.) The Court conducted its own search of this Court’s records and found no 25 previous appearances by attorney Meriel Darzen, and only one previous Pro Hac Vice 26 application by Ralph Bloemers in the year 2012. Based on these facts and review of the 27 remainder of the submitted applications, the Court will grant the applications for admission. The 28 Court requests counsel to use more care in the future when filling out forms for the Court to 1 1 review. Accordingly, Meriel Darzen’s and Ralph Bloemers’ applications for admission to 2 3 practice Pro Hac Vice are HEREBY GRANTED. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: October 10, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?