(PC) Gilbert v. Allison et al

Filing 65

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/9/2021. Merits-Based Discovery due by 1/21/2022. Dispositive Motions filed by 3/25/2022. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
Case 1:19-cv-01464-NONE-SAB Document 65 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES TRAYZON GILBERT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et.al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Charles Trayzon Gilbert is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 27, 2021, the Court denied Defendants’ exhaustion-related motion for summary 19 20 ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01464-NONE-SAB (PC) ) ) ) AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) judgment, without prejudice. (ECF No. 63.) 21 On September 1, 2021, Defendants were directed to notify the Court of their wish to proceed 22 with an evidentiary hearing on the issue of exhaustion within seven days. (ECF No. 64.) The Court 23 advised that if Defendants did not wish to proceed with an evidentiary hearing, the issue of exhaustion 24 would be deemed waived and the Court would proceed to the merits of the case. (Id.) Defendants have not filed a response to the September 1, 2021 order, and the Court, therefore, 25 26 assumes Defendants do not wish to proceed with an evidentiary hearing and the issue of non- 27 exhaustion of the administrative remedies is deemed waived. 28 /// 1 Case 1:19-cv-01464-NONE-SAB Document 65 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The new merits-based discovery deadline is: January 21, 2022; 3 2. The new dispositive motion deadline is: March 25, 2022; and 4 3. All other substantive provisions of the Court’s May 11, 2020, discovery and scheduling order remain in effect. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 September 9, 2021 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?