(PC) Gilbert v. Allison et al
Filing
65
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/9/2021. Merits-Based Discovery due by 1/21/2022. Dispositive Motions filed by 3/25/2022. (Jessen, A)
Case 1:19-cv-01464-NONE-SAB Document 65 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARLES TRAYZON GILBERT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
KATHLEEN ALLISON, et.al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff Charles Trayzon Gilbert is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
17
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On August 27, 2021, the Court denied Defendants’ exhaustion-related motion for summary
19
20
) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01464-NONE-SAB (PC)
)
)
) AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
judgment, without prejudice. (ECF No. 63.)
21
On September 1, 2021, Defendants were directed to notify the Court of their wish to proceed
22
with an evidentiary hearing on the issue of exhaustion within seven days. (ECF No. 64.) The Court
23
advised that if Defendants did not wish to proceed with an evidentiary hearing, the issue of exhaustion
24
would be deemed waived and the Court would proceed to the merits of the case. (Id.)
Defendants have not filed a response to the September 1, 2021 order, and the Court, therefore,
25
26
assumes Defendants do not wish to proceed with an evidentiary hearing and the issue of non-
27
exhaustion of the administrative remedies is deemed waived.
28
///
1
Case 1:19-cv-01464-NONE-SAB Document 65 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The new merits-based discovery deadline is: January 21, 2022;
3
2.
The new dispositive motion deadline is: March 25, 2022; and
4
3.
All other substantive provisions of the Court’s May 11, 2020, discovery and scheduling
order remain in effect.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
September 9, 2021
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?