Poozesh et al vs Pompeo et al

Filing 82

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE: Dispositive Motions filed by 1/19/2021, Oppositions due by 2/9/2021, Replies due by 2/23/2021. Deadline to file a Joint Statement setting a Settlement Conference is due by 12/15/2020. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/17/2020.(Kusamura, W)

1
2
3
4
5

CURTIS LEE MORRISON (State Bar No. 321106)
THE LAW OFFICE OF RAFAEL URENA
925 N. La Brea, 4th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90038
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

SEYED AMIN SAM
MOTAGHEDI, ET AL.,

Case No.: 1:19−CV−01466−NONE−SKO

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE

v.
(Doc. 81)
MICHAEL R. POMPEO, ET AL.,
Defendants.

Honorable Judge Sheila K. Oberto

17
18

In lieu of pending motions awaiting judgment in his case, including Plaintiffs’ March 16,
19
20

2020 Motion under F.R.C.P. 12(f). (Dkt. No. 58) and Plaintiffs’ October 5, 2020 Motion to Compel

21

Production of the Complete Administrative Record. (Dkt. No. 77), Plaintiffs, hereby request an

22

extension of deadlines set in the Court’s scheduling order (Dkt. No. 66). Defendants do not object,

23

except to note that the Defendants also have a pending motion to stay all briefing deadlines in this

24

case. Dkt. No. 67.

25
26
27
28

The parties now stipulate that the date for filing Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment

1
2

should be extended to January 19, 2021. Defendants state that they do not intend to file an

3

opposition at this time because defendants have requested a stay in all briefing deadlines. Dkt.

4

67.

5
6
7

Dated: November 16, 2020

8

/s/ CURTIS LEE MORRISON

9

CURTIS LEE MORRISON
Attorney for the Plaintiffs

10
11
12

Dated: November 16, 2020

13

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney

14

/s/ AUDREY B. HEMESATH
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney

15
16
17
18

ORDER

19

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 81), and good cause appearing, IT IS

20

HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s scheduling order (Doc. 66) is MODIFIED as follows:

21
22

1.

19, 2021.

23
24

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment shall be filed by no later than January

2.

Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion, as well as their cross-motion for
summary judgment, shall be filed by no later than February 9, 2021.

25

3.
26
27
28

Plaintiffs’ reply brief in support of their motion, as well as their opposition to

1

Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment, shall be filed by no later

2

February 23, 2021.
4.

3

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and Defendants’ cross-motion for
summary judgment shall be set for hearing no later than March 24, 2021.

4

5.

5

The Court holds Settlement Conferences on Tuesdays and Thursdays at 10:30 a.m.
Counsel are to thoroughly discuss the advantages of and possibilities for settlement

6

with their respective clients, and each other, in order to propose a date on which a

7

Settlement Conference will be set. By no later than December 15, 2020, the parties

8

shall file a joint statement 1) confirming that they have met and conferred, and 2)
9

setting forth three to four proposed Settlement Conference dates in accordance with
10

the Court’s calendar.1

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 17, 2020

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The Court notes that the parties did not comply with this Court’s prior deadline of September 16, 2020, to provide
settlement conference dates. Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions
on any and all counsel as well as any party or parties who cause non-compliance with this order.
1