(PC) Bland v. Allen et al

Filing 38

ORDER ADOPTING 35 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/18/2020. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA D. BLAND, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:19-cv-01499-NONE-EPG (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (Doc. Nos. 30 & 35) REUBEN A. SALAZAR, II, 15 Defendant. 16 Joshua Bland (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 17 18 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 25, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for injunctive relief. (Doc. No. 30.) On 21 October 13, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, 22 recommending “that Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief be DENIED” because the requested 23 relief has no relationship to the claim pled in the complaint. (Doc. No. 35 at 3.) 24 Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and 25 recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed and plaintiff has not filed 26 objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. 27 ///// 28 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 3 the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 4 analysis. 5 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on October 13, 2020, (Doc. No. 35), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 7 8 9 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: November 18, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?