Edelbrock, LLC v. Whipple Industries, Inc.
Filing
69
Order GRANTING stipulation to stay case pending reexamination, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/26/2021. If the USPTO has not yet issued a Reexamination Certificate, the parties shall file a joint status report by 10/26/2021 advising the Court of the status of Reexamination.(Rosales, O.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDELBROCK, LLC,
12
13
14
Case No. 1:19-cv-01502-DAD-EPG
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
STAY CASE PENDING REEXAMINATION
WHIPPLE INDUSTRIES, INC.,
(ECF No. 67)
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Reexamination (ECF No. 67),
and for good cause shown,
19
IT IS HEREBYORDERED that:
20
1.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
This lawsuit, including all discovery, is STAYED pending final resolution of the
current reexamination of the ‘481 Patent through issuance of a Reexamination
Certificate;
2. Within seven days after the USPTO issues a Reexamination Certificate, the parties
shall provide a joint status report advising the Court of the issuance of a
Reexamination Certificate and providing a copy thereof;
3. Within twenty-one days after the USPTO issues a Reexamination Certificate, the
Parties shall file a joint status report advising the Court of the parties' proposal(s) for
rescheduling the remainder of this lawsuit or otherwise terminating the lawsuit;
1
1
4. Within six months of entry of this order, if the USPTO has not yet issued a
2
Reexamination Certificate, the parties shall file a joint status report advising the Court
3
of the status of Reexamination; and
4
5. The Court reserves the right to lift the stay to the extent there is undue delay with the
5
reexamination.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 26, 2021
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?