(SS) Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/17/2020. (Apodaca, P)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jonathan O. Peña, Esq.
CA Bar ID No.: 278044
Peña & Bromberg, PLC
2440 Tulare St., Ste. 320
Fresno, CA 93721
Telephone: 559-439-9700
Facsimile: 559-439-9723
Email: info@jonathanpena.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, Andy Villa Diaz
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
12 ANDY VILLA DIAZ,
Case No. 1:19-cv-01661-GSA
13
STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD
AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY
FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT
TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT; ORDER
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
16 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of
Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
19
(Doc. 26)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
20 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded
21 attorney fees and expenses in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED
22 SIXTY-ONE DOLLARS AND 76/100, $5,861.76, under the Equal Access to Justice Act
23 (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services
24 rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in
25 accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
26
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
27 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to Astrue
28
1 v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor
2 the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under
3 the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA
4 fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
5
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
6 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause
7 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to the
8 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s
9 counsel, Jonathan O. Peña.
10
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for
11 EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
12 Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute
13 a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel
14 including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with
15 this action.
16
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel’s firm to
17 seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings
18 clause provisions of the EAJA.
19
Respectfully submitted,
20
21
Dated: October 23, 2020
/s/ Jonathan O. Peña
JONATHAN O. PEÑA
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: November 17, 2020
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
3
4
By: _*_Ellinor R. Coder
Ellinor R. Coder
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
(*Permission to use electronic signature
obtained via email on November 17, 2020).
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
ORDER
1
2
3
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access
to Justice Act Fees and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the
4
5 amount of $5,861.76 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms
6 of the Stipulation.
7
8
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated:
November 17, 2020
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?