(PC) Ardds v. Hicks et al

Filing 40

ORDER DENYING 33 Plaintiff's Fourth Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, re 33 & 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/13/2020. (Rivera, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTOINE L. ARDDS,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

D. HICKS, et.al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:19-cv-01738-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH
MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER
(ECF Nos. 33, 34)

Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

20

On August 25, 2020, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations recommending

21

that Plaintiff’s fourth motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. (ECF No. 34.) The

22

Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections were

23

due within fourteen days. (Id.) No objections were filed and the time to do has expired.

24

On September 16, 2020, the action was reassigned from District Judge Dale A. Drozd to the

25

undersigned based on the parties consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 39.)

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

In light of the reassignment of the case to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1),

1
2

the August 25, 2020 Findings and Recommendations are converted to a final order and Plaintiff’s

3

fourth motion for a temporary restraining order is denied for the reasons explained therein. (ECF Nos.

4

33, 34.)

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated:

8

October 13, 2020
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2