(SS) Singh v. Commissioner of Social Security
AMENDED STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/16/2021. IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($9,700.00) as authorized by the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (Gonzales, V)
Jonathan O. Peña, Esq.
CA Bar ID No.: 278044
Peña & Bromberg, PLC
2440 Tulare St., Ste. 320
Fresno, CA 93721
Attorney for Plaintiff, Sandra Singh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 SANDRA SINGH,
Case No. 1:19-cv-01791-SKO
AMENDED STIPULATION FOR THE
AWARD AND PAYMENT OF
ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS
TO JUSTICE ACT; ORDER
16 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
20 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded
21 attorney fees and expenses in the amount of NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED
22 DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($9,700.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28
23 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered
24 on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with
25 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
27 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to
1 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability
2 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset
3 allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After
4 the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are
5 subject to any offset.
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
7 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause
8 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to
9 the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to
10 Plaintiff’s counsel, Jonathan O. Peña.
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for
12 EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
13 Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall
14 constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or
15 Counsel including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in
16 connection with this action.
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel’s firm
18 to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the
19 savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
Dated: July 15, 2021
/s/ Jonathan O. Peña
JONATHAN O. PEÑA
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: July 15, 2021
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
Acting United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
By: _/s/ Marcelo N. Illarmo_
Marcelo N. Illarmo
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
(*Permission to use electronic signature
obtained via email on July 15, 2021).
Based upon the parties’ Amended Stipulation for the Award and Payment of
11 Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Expenses (the “Stipulation”) (Doc. 25),
IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of NINE THOUSAND
14 SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($9,700.00) as authorized by the Equal
15 Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), be awarded subject to the terms of
19 IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
July 16, 2021
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?