Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. FirstChoice Medical Group, Inc., et al.
Filing
41
STIPULATED EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS;ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/27/2021. (Dispositive Motions filed by 5/26/2021, Pretrial Conference set for 9/13/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd)(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
Theodore W. Hoppe, #138064
HOPPE LAW GROUP
680 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 207
Fresno, CA 93704
Telephone: (559) 241-7070
Facsimile: (559) 241-7212
tad@hoppe-law.com
5
6
7
8
9
Roderick T. Dunne (admitted pro hac vice)
Karbal, Cohen, Economou, Silk & Dunne, LLC
150 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 1700
Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: (312) 431-3700
Fax: (312) 431-3670
rdunne@karballaw.com
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
FIRSTCHOICE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., )
DR. MANTHANI REDDY, DR. KIRAN )
REDDY, DR. CHINNAPA NAREDDY,
)
DR. JOSE-LUIS BAUTISTA, DR. PAM
)
JANDA, DR. TARLOCHAN TAGORE,
)
DR. MADHAVA NARALA, DR.
)
AJIT KHAIRA and SMARTMED, INC.
)
d/b/a MEDSMART CONSULTING
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No. 1:19-cv-01794-DAD-BAM
STIPULATED EXTENSION OF DEADLINE
FOR PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS;
ORDER
24
25
26
STIPULATION
Plaintiff, Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company (“Atlantic”), and Defendants,
27
FIRSTCHOICE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., DR. MANTHANI REDDY, DR. KIRAN REDDY,
28
-1-1DEFENDANT OF DEADLINE
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
STIPULATED EXTENSION
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
FOR PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS; ORDER
1
DR. CHINNAPA NAREDDY, DR. JOSE-LUIS BAUTISTA, DR. PAM JANDA, DR.
2
TARLOCHAN TAGORE, DR. MADHAVA NARALA and DR. AJIT KHAIRA (collectively,
3
“FIRSTCHOICE”), and SMARTMED, INC., doing business as MedSmart Consulting
4
(“SmartMed”) (collectively, “Defendants”), hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
5
6
7
WHEREAS, Counsel for Atlantic has experienced multiple changes in staffing, including
the April 16, 2021 departure of the main handling attorney, Alan Posner;
WHEREAS, Atlantic would benefit from a brief 30-day extension for its new handling
8
attorney(s) to adequately review and revise Atlantic’s Motion for Summary Judgment;
9
WHEREAS, Defendants do not object to the requested extension, and;
10
11
12
WHEREAS: This extension is not being sought for any improper purpose or delay, and
will not otherwise alter the Scheduling Order currently in place for this matter;
WHEREAS: Counsel for Atlantic has obtained approval of all parties hereto
13
Atlantic has timely requested a thirty-day extension of all pertinent deadlines to file its Motion
14
for Summary Judgment, and that Defendants.
15
ACCORDINGLY, Atlantic and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel,
16
hereby agree and stipulate that the deadline for dispositive and non-dispositive pre-trial motions
17
is hereby extended from its current date of April 26, 2021 to May 26, 2021. In addition, Atlantic
18
hereby represents that it will not seek any further extensions for its Motion for Summary
19
Judgment.
20
Dated: April 23, 2021
HOPPE LAW GROUP
21
By: /s/ Theodore W. Hoppe
Theodore W. Hoppe
Attorneys for Plaintiff
22
23
24
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY
25
26
27
28
-2-2DEFENDANT OF DEADLINE
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
STIPULATED EXTENSION
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
FOR PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS; ORDER
1
Dated: April 23, 2021
KARBAL, COHEN, ECONOMOU, SILK & DUNNE, LLC
2
By: /s/ Rory T. Dunne
Rory T. Dunne (PHV)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
3
4
5
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY
6
7
Dated: April 23, 2021
8
HAHN LOESER & PARKS LLP
By: /s/ James E. Heffner
James E. Heffner
Lindsay J. Mertens
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant
SMARTMED, INC.
11
12
Dated: April 23, 2021
WILKINS, DROLSHAGEN & CZESHINSKI, LLP
13
14
By: /s/ James H. Wilkins
James H. Wilkins
Attorneys for Defendants
15
16
FIRSTCHOICE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,
DR. MANTHANI REDDY, DR. KIRAN
REDDY, DR. CHINNAPA NAREDDY,
DR. JOSE-LUIS BAUTISTA, DR. PAM
JANDA, DR. TARLOCHAN TAGORE,
DR. MADHAVA NARALA, DR. AJIT
KHAIRA
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-3DEFENDANT OF DEADLINE
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
STIPULATED EXTENSION
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
FOR PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS; ORDER
1
ORDER
2
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, and based on the parties' stipulation, the
3
Court hereby modifies its Scheduling Order (Doc. 34) and orders that the dispositive motion
4
deadline only shall be extended to May 26, 2021. The deadline for non-dispositive motions
5
remains unmodified, as all discovery deadlines have either passed or remain unchanged.
6
7
Additionally, the party’s existing Pretrial Conference date is no longer compatible with
8
the modified Dispositive Motions deadline. Accordingly, the Scheduling Order (Doc. 34) is
9
further MODIFIED and the Pretrial Conference currently set for July 12, 2021 is continued to
10
11
Monday, September 13, 2021 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale
A. Drozd.
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 27, 2021
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-4DEFENDANT OF DEADLINE
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
STIPULATED EXTENSION
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
FOR PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS; ORDER
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on April 23, 2021 a copy of the foregoing document(s) were
3
electronically filed using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to all
4
CM/ECF participants.
5
/s/ Theodore W. Hoppe
Theodore W. Hoppe
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-5DEFENDANT OF DEADLINE
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’
STIPULATED EXTENSION
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
FOR PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS; ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?